Management and Leadership of Disney's Magic Kingdom PowerPoint Presentation

Management and Leadership of Disneys deception Kingdom - PowerPoint Presentation Exampleoday, it consists of water parks, depicted object parks, championship golf courses, resort hotels, and Disney vacation club properties together with sports complex and Downtown Disney. Disneys conjuring Kingdom has not only become the worlds most popular vacation destinations but also a huge contributor to the economy.The Success of the company can be reflected to the time of Walt Disney. His chief(prenominal) aim was to make the company successful by producing unique, creative, and quality entertainment experiences. This can be highlighted by the success of the Mickey Mouse, the first full-length animated movie ever to be produced (Stewart, 2006). The success of the Magic Kingdom has prevailed in spite of several unsuccessful CEOs at the company. Over the years, the company has expanded its composing parks and reached high profits.However, the company has faced a number of challenges under Michael Eisner. Eisners leadership function at the company raised questions regarding Disneys corporate governance. This reflects to the hiring and firing of Ovitz just fourteen months after his hiring (Lisa, 2012). at that place was incomplete communication to the board about the situation of Ovitz. The information infrastructure faced the challenge of who accepted what type of communication, the form of communication and frequency of communication. Another challenge was Eisners hiring of close friends as directors to plead his support within the board. This implied that the company lacked proper mechanisms in the hiring of executive members. Furthermore, the situation at the company was compromised by the shareholders revolt that was pushed by Roy E. Disney to remove Eisner from the companys leadership (Stewart, 2006). With the support of the board, he removed Eisner from chairmanship. This was a critical point in the companys corporate governance since in its last both decad es it was uncommon to vote against the re-election of any member in public companies (Lisa, 2012).Eisners